I needcomplete5-6 pages paperon the following assignment.HALF PAGE LENGTH IS NOT ACCEPTED.Mustaddress the all steps properly.Mustinclude4-5 credible referencesand cited inAPA.Must provide100% originalwork.
DO NOT PROVIDE THE PREVIOUSLY USED WORK.
DO NOT WRITE QUESTIONS IN ANSWER!
Research a court case in which the defendant is charged with honest services fraud. This type of crime is referred to ina 28-word sentence of18 U.S.C.1346(the federalmail and wire fraudstatute) added by theUnited States Congressin 1988 which states: For the purposes of this chapter the termscheme or artifice to defraudincludes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services.[Seehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Honest_services_fraud].
You must use a case where there was an actual trial; plea bargains or other truncated cases are not appropriate for this assignment. You must attach the case along with your paperas part of this assignment. Failure to submit the actual case will result in a lower grade.
This assignment will introduce you to the concept of case briefing and will also have you explain additional items of concern that will help you build an understanding of the case and the criminal prosecution. In completing the assessment use information from the text supplemental readings videos and external sources including electronic and print sources.
Please be cognizant that when using sources not normally considered scholarly e.g. videos television programs and newspaper and magazine articles you will be held responsible for determining their scholarly value. If you are in doubt contact me.
In complete 5-6 pages address the following sections in your paper:
I. Elements of the crime.Identify and discuss the elements of the crime as the prosecution proved them.
II. Defenses claimed by the defense.Identify and discuss any defensesclaimed by the defendant.
III. Constitutional protection issues.Identify and discuss any constitutional protection issues (e.g.Mirandawarnings search and seizure).
IV. Case brief.Use the required formula:
a) Title and citation
b) Facts of the case
d) Holding (the final decision)
e) Reasoning (how the court arrived at this holding)
f) Analysis (how the facts of the case meet the legal criteria for prosecution)
V. Your judgment.If you were the judge or a juror in this case would you have agreed with the outcome? If yes explain why; if no explain why.